The GM Food Democracy

The legal battle raging over labelling genetically modified food should be the clearest warning for us that there is something wrong with this product. After all, if GM food is truly safe, then why does Monsanto object to labelling its products, which simply provide people with a choice? What have companies like Monsanto got to hide?

As the world’s population grows, given the limited resources of the planet and the likelihood of reduced production due to the effects of climate change, producing enough food is looming as a major concern for our future. It is a complex problem that includes such factors as health, economy, environment, trade and human rights. These sectors of society often have competing interests, making issues of sustainable food practices difficult to agree upon or legislate.

The global population is expected to reach nine billion by 2050. This means the world will need 30% more food and 40% more water than is currently available. Genetically modified food has been presented as a solution to these problems. The argument goes that to feed this increased population, we are going to need high yields not low yields; we are going to need genetically modified crops; we are going to need pesticides and fertilizers and other elements of the industrialized food processes that have led mankind to be better fed and live longer than at any time in history. This approach is toted as being serious about the world’s needs, and believes we should trust monitoring agencies that ensure pesticides are used at safe levels.

Alternatively the solution offered by the Organic Foods Movement is maligned by these food corporations as a fable of a pampered elite living in countries with food security and something like the hippy movement of the 1960’s – a romantic and comforting notion.

But to suggest such a one sided approach to solving the world’s looming food security crisis avoids the real issue of sustainable population growth. It perpetuates the myth that we can continue to live on this planet in an irresponsible way, using whatever we want without acknowledging the truth about the limitations of the planet. We need to consider such things as working to curb population growth because we have already gone beyond the carrying capacity of our planet. We need to look at better agricultural methods that move away from industrialised cheap calories and toward organic, small-scale production, with plenty of fruits and vegetables.

Rather than the Organic Food Movement being elitist, to say that humanity is better fed and longer lived now than at any time in history reveals an elitist mentality. Billions of people go to bed hungry every night, with no relief in sight. Mortality statistics are also skewed heavily in favour of wealthy countries. Those of us in industrialized nations are, depending on class standing, living longer and eating better than in the past, but only at the cost of tremendous draining of resources from other parts of the world.

Trusting the monitoring agencies is also somewhat of a romanticized view. The current system of ‘safe levels’ established by organizations like the EPA or FDA in fact cannot be categorically considered ‘safe.’ Thousands of chemicals enter the market without sufficient testing. The current standard is based on a ‘presumed innocent until proven guilty’ philosophy where to be proven guilty first people must get sick and die.

Monsanto’s GM corn and soybean seeds have already produced a new crop of ‘superweeds’ that have evolved to resist strong herbicides. On the 6th of September, Aviva Shen wrote an article in ThinkProgress about the EPA’s review of one of Monsanto’s corn strains engineered to produce the natural pesticide Bt. due to mounting evidence raising concerns that insect resistance is developing in parts of the corn belt where Monsanto’s corn dominates the fields. Root worms exposed to the corn’s toxin seem to have become immune to it, breeding an unprecedented colony of superworms that are bound to spread throughout the entire Midwest.

Monsanto recently spent $4.2 million trying to kill a November ballot initiative in California that would require labelling on food products containing genetically modified ingredients. Proposition 37 would bring the state in line with Japan, China, the European Union, and Australia, which already require labels on genetically modified foods. It is interesting to note in Shen’s article that 91% of Americans support GM labelling on food. Should companies like Monsanto win the right to keep people in the dark about the food they are eating, it would truly call into question whether the US truly is a democracy or a corporation.


About Passionist JPIC Australia

I am a priest with the Passionist Congregation and a part of our Australian Province which includes Australia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Vietnam. I have been ordained since December of 1992. I was born in the Philippines, though am from Spanish decent. I came to Australia in 1972 with my family when I was 11 years old, and we settled in Brisbane. That is where I did the rest of my growing up. On completing high school, I went to Queensland University where I studied for 4 years, completing a B.Sc. with a major in Microbiology. The following year I decided to enter into the Passionist Congregation to study for the priesthood. I trained for 9 years, and have been a priest for 25 years. In my time as a priest I have been Director of the Passionist Family Group Movement in Victoria, Tasmania and Queensland; conducted over 400 Parish Missions all around Australia and New Zealand, but particularly in Victoria and Western Australia; worked in adult faith education, Sacramental preparation for children and parents; Hospital chaplaincy; High school chaplaincy, in-services and retreats. In the year 200 I became engaged in developing young adult retreat teams and training them to carry on our high school retreat programs. I am also chair of our Province’s committee for Justice, Peace and the Integrity of Creation (JPIC). I am also a member of ACRATH (Australian Catholic Religious Against Trafficking in Humans).
This entry was posted in Integrity of Creation and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The GM Food Democracy

  1. Finally a person that puts some real work into a blog. I do like what you have done with the blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s